Bautista v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Full title: MARLON BAUTISTA, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Mar 4, 2024

2:23-cv-857-KCD (M.D. Fla. Mar. 4, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-857-KCD

03-04-2024

MARLON BAUTISTA, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

KYLE C. DUDEK, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER

KYLE C. DUDEK, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court is the Commissioner's Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment With Remand.¹ (Doc. 15.) The Commissioner believes that remand is appropriate to conduct further administrative proceedings, offer the claimant the opportunity for a hearing, and issue a new decision. (Id. at 1.) Plaintiff consents to the relief requested.

1 The parties consented to a magistrate judge's consideration of this motion. (Docs. 17, 18.)

Under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Court has the power to enter judgment, reversing and remanding a social security case for rehearing. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-98 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 10102 (1991). The Commissioner's request for remand is appropriate, and given Plaintiff's consent, it will be granted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

1. The Commissioner's Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment With Remand (Doc. 15) is GRANTED.

2. The Commissioner's decision denying benefits is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings.

3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, terminate all deadlines, deny all pending motions as moot, and close the file.