Opinion
Argued February 10, 1926 —
Decided October 18, 1926.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported ante, p. 1.
For the respondent, Martin P. Devlin.
For the appellant, Edward L. Katzenbach.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, BLACK, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, JJ. 7.
For reversal — KATZENBACH, WHITE, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 4.