From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baumgartner v. Perry Pub. Sch.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jul 10, 2015
865 N.W.2d 43 (Mich. 2015)

Opinion

Docket No. 151479, 151480, 151481. COA Nos. 313945, 314158, 314696.

2015-07-10

Shelby BAUMGARTNER, Loretta Cole and Margaret Sible, Petitioners–Appellants, v. PERRY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Respondent–Appellee. Sara Aubert, Philip David, Paula Justin, Kellee Beilfuss, Lisa Beilfuss and Karen Knapp, Petitioners–Appellants, v. Reed City Area Schools Board of Education, Respondent–Appellee. Carmen Adamo Wright, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Board of Education of the Flint Community Schools, Respondent–Appellee.


Order

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to stay the precedential effect of the published opinion of the Court of Appeals is DENIED.

BERNSTEIN, J., would grant leave to appeal.


Summaries of

Baumgartner v. Perry Pub. Sch.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jul 10, 2015
865 N.W.2d 43 (Mich. 2015)
Case details for

Baumgartner v. Perry Pub. Sch.

Case Details

Full title:Shelby BAUMGARTNER, Loretta Cole and Margaret Sible…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Jul 10, 2015

Citations

865 N.W.2d 43 (Mich. 2015)
498 Mich. 864