From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baumgardner v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 3, 1992
603 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 1992)

Opinion

No. 78689.

September 3, 1992.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decisions, Fourth District — Case No. 90-3337 (Broward County).

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Margaret Good, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Jacqueline Barakat and Michelle A. Smith, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.


Upon the authority of Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla. 1992), we quash State v. Baumgardner, 587 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), and remand with directions to reinstate Baumgardner's probation.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

GRIMES, J., dissents with an opinion, in which HARDING, J, concur.

McDONALD, J., dissents.


I dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla. 1992).

HARDING, J., concurs.


Summaries of

Baumgardner v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 3, 1992
603 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 1992)
Case details for

Baumgardner v. State

Case Details

Full title:TODD RUSSELL BAUMGARDNER, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 3, 1992

Citations

603 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 1992)

Citing Cases

State v. McKendry

Initially, the state relies heavily on State v. Scates, 585 So.2d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), and State v. Lane,…