From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baumann v. Stetten, Baumann

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 16, 1932
180 N.E. 353 (N.Y. 1932)

Opinion

Submitted January 11, 1932

Decided February 16, 1932


Motion by plaintiff for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements.

Motions to amend remittitur granted to the following extent; return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended, first, so as to provide that the respondents Berenice L. Baumann, Elizabeth Baumann and Charles Baumann are not entitled to costs at the Appellate Division as against the defendants Stetten and Greenbaum; and, second, so as to provide that the matter of compensation of the special guardian be remitted to the Special Term there to be dealt with as that court may be advised. (See 257 N.Y. 480.)


Summaries of

Baumann v. Stetten, Baumann

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 16, 1932
180 N.E. 353 (N.Y. 1932)
Case details for

Baumann v. Stetten, Baumann

Case Details

Full title:C. LUDWIG BAUMANN, Appellant, v. DeWITT STETTEN et al., as Trustees, et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 16, 1932

Citations

180 N.E. 353 (N.Y. 1932)
258 N.Y. 607