Baumann v. Naugle

Full title: BERTHA BAUMANN, appellant, v. REGINALD B. NAUGLE et al., respondents

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 29, 1925

98 N.J. Eq. 687 (N.J. 1925)

Opinion

Decided September 29th, 1925.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan, whose opinion is reported in 97 N.J. Eq. 110.

Mr. Earl A. Merrill, for the appellant.

Mr. Augustus C. Nash, for the respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.