From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baum v. Baum

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Oct 22, 2021
No. 355491 (Mich. Ct. App. Oct. 22, 2021)

Opinion

355491

10-22-2021

Lynn Beth Baum v. David Baum


LC No. 2015-149725-CZ

Mark J. Cavanagh Kathleen Jansen Judges

ORDER

Deborah A. Servitto Presiding Judge

The motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

The motion to remand is DENIED for failure to persuade the Court of the necessity of a remand at this time. Denial of remand is without prejudice to a case call panel of this Court determining that remand is necessary once the case is submitted on a session calendar.

Jansen, J., would grant the motion to remand.

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr., Chief Clerk, on


Summaries of

Baum v. Baum

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Oct 22, 2021
No. 355491 (Mich. Ct. App. Oct. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Baum v. Baum

Case Details

Full title:Lynn Beth Baum v. David Baum

Court:Court of Appeals of Michigan

Date published: Oct 22, 2021

Citations

No. 355491 (Mich. Ct. App. Oct. 22, 2021)