From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baughman v. Libasci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1968
30 A.D.2d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

June 24, 1968


Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered August 1, 1967, reversed, on the law; new trial granted as to the cause for personal injuries, with costs to appellant to abide the event; and the cause for property injury is severed and an amended judgment is directed to be entered upon the trial court's dismissal of that cause at the close of plaintiff's case. Findings of fact implicit in the verdict of the jury on the cause for personal injuries are affirmed. In this action stemming from a vehicular collision at an intersection controlled by traffic lights, it was error for the court to refuse to charge that a motorist, passing through a green light, has the right to assume that cross-traffic will heed the red light ( Shea v. Judson, 283 N.Y. 393; Healy v. Rennert, 9 N.Y.2d 202; Foley v. State of New York, 265 App. Div. 682). Beldock, P.J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Baughman v. Libasci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1968
30 A.D.2d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Baughman v. Libasci

Case Details

Full title:FLAVY B. BAUGHMAN, JR., Appellant, v. MICHAEL LIBASCI et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 24, 1968

Citations

30 A.D.2d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Vollerthun v. Kelly

A motorist facing a green traffic signal usually has the right to assume that the light is red for cross…

Ruiz v. Brohan

Section 1111 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law permits motorists approaching an intersection with a green…