From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baugh v. Eisele

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Nov 9, 1999
4 S.W.3d 630 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. ED 75252.

Filed: November 9, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Samuel J. Hais, Judge.

Bruce F. Hilton, Lawrence G. Gillespie, Kirkwood, for appellant.

Sandford J. Miller, William F. Whealen, Sharon E. Remis, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before: MARY RHODES RUSSELL, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Sr.J.



ORDER


Father appeals the trial court's judgment modifying the dissolution decree by increasing his monthly child support payments. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo.banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Baugh v. Eisele

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Nov 9, 1999
4 S.W.3d 630 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Baugh v. Eisele

Case Details

Full title:JULIE ANN BAUGH, PETITIONER/RESPONDENT, v. LAWRENCE THOMAS EISELE…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Nov 9, 1999

Citations

4 S.W.3d 630 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)