From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Batz v. Jefferson Cnty. Corr. Facility

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Sep 20, 2021
Civil Action 1:21-CV-60 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 20, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:21-CV-60

09-20-2021

EDGAR ANTONIO TACAXOY BATZ v. JEFFERSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Thad Heartfield United States District Judge

Plaintiff, Edgar Antonio Tacaxoy Batx, a pretrial detainee currently confined at the Jefferson County Correctional Facility, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant the Jefferson County Correctional Facility.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing this case for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) as plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee and failed to file a verified application to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied with a certified income trust statement for the preceding six month period (docket entry no. 7).

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge have been filed to date.Plaintiff did file what appeared to be an application to proceed in forma pauperis (docket entry no. 11). However, the application is not verified and does not contain a certified income trust statement for the preceding six month period as ordered. There is simply a note that “per Captain Harrell court orders for inmate account history are void when sent to an inmate.” Id. Plaintiff has had since March 15, 2021 to provide a verified application to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied with a certified income trust statement for the preceding six month period. Despite ample time to do so, plaintiff has failed to comply and has failed to otherwise pay the full filing fee.

Plaintiff received a copy of the Report and Recommendation on April 6, 2021 (docket entry no. 10).

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A Final Judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendations.


Summaries of

Batz v. Jefferson Cnty. Corr. Facility

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Sep 20, 2021
Civil Action 1:21-CV-60 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Batz v. Jefferson Cnty. Corr. Facility

Case Details

Full title:EDGAR ANTONIO TACAXOY BATZ v. JEFFERSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division

Date published: Sep 20, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 1:21-CV-60 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 20, 2021)