From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Battles v. Battles

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 8, 1976
227 S.E.2d 524 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

51796.

ARGUED FEBRUARY 2, 1976.

DECIDED JUNE 8, 1976.

Garnishment. Muscogee Superior Court. Before Judge Smith.

Page, Scrantom, Harris, McGlamry Chapman, Joan Swift, for appellant.

H. Palmer Carr, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Schumacher, Collins Oates, Samuel W. Oates, Jr., Thomas O. L. Collins, for appellee.


This is a post-judgment garnishment case which was commenced prior to July 1, 1975, pursuant to our then existing garnishment statutes. The Supreme Court in Coursin v. Harper, 236 Ga. 729, held that the Georgia procedure for pre-judgment and post-judgment garnishment as it existed prior to July 1, 1975, failed to provide due process and was unconstitutional. Coursin controls and the judgment of the trial court for the plaintiff must be reversed.

Judgment reversed. Clark and Stolz, JJ., concur.

ARGUED FEBRUARY 2, 1976 — DECIDED JUNE 8, 1976.


Summaries of

Battles v. Battles

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 8, 1976
227 S.E.2d 524 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Battles v. Battles

Case Details

Full title:BATTLES v. BATTLES et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jun 8, 1976

Citations

227 S.E.2d 524 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
227 S.E.2d 524

Citing Cases

Cox v. Vulcan Basement Waterproofing Co.

WEBB, Judge. This post-judgment garnishment case is controlled by Coursin v. Harper, 236 Ga. 729 ( 225 S.E.2d…

Wright v. Wright

The appeal is premature and must be dismissed. Nash v. Carlile, 138 Ga. App. 906. On remand see Coursin v.…