From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Battle v. Ozmint

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 24, 2013
548 F. App'x 953 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-7436

12-24-2013

KORELL BATTLE, a/k/a Korell Robert Floyd Battle, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN OZMINT; FREDRICK THOMPSON; D. BAILEY; MCKITHER BODISON; DARRYL KING; GILMORE; JOHN DOE, Officer, Defendants - Appellees.

Korell Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Nikole D. Haltiwanger, Roy F. Laney, Damon C. Wlodarczyk, RILEY, POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (2:12-cv-01350-CMC) Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Korell Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Nikole D. Haltiwanger, Roy F. Laney, Damon C. Wlodarczyk, RILEY, POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Korell Battle appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Battle v. Ozmint, No. 2:12-cv-01350-CMC (D.S.C. Aug. 27, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Battle v. Ozmint

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 24, 2013
548 F. App'x 953 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Battle v. Ozmint

Case Details

Full title:KORELL BATTLE, a/k/a Korell Robert Floyd Battle, Plaintiff - Appellant, v…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 24, 2013

Citations

548 F. App'x 953 (4th Cir. 2013)