From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Battle v. Kail

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 7, 2021
Civil Action 2:21-cv-1682 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 7, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:21-cv-1682

12-07-2021

ISSA BATTLE, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN D. KAIL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Lisa Pupo Lenihan, Magistrate Judge

The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's Authorization Form. However, it appears as though Plaintiff did not complete the form correctly. Plaintiff was instructed to sign EITHER the top section that authorizes monthly payments from his inmate account (assuming Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this case) OR the bottom section that moves to withdraw this action without payment of any portion of the filing fee (assuming Plaintiff no longer wishes to proceed with this case). He was to sign one or the other, but Plaintiff signed both sections. It is therefore impossible to know how Plaintiff wishes to proceed.

AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2021, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enclose with this Order another copy of the Authorization Form. Plaintiff shall sign only one section of the form and return it within ten days of the date of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to return the form on time then this action may be dismissed for his failure to prosecute.


Summaries of

Battle v. Kail

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 7, 2021
Civil Action 2:21-cv-1682 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Battle v. Kail

Case Details

Full title:ISSA BATTLE, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN D. KAIL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 7, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 2:21-cv-1682 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 7, 2021)