From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Battle v. Hattle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Dec 24, 2013
CASE NO. C13-5086 BHS-KLS (W.D. Wash. Dec. 24, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. C13-5086 BHS-KLS

12-24-2013

JAMES A. BATTLE JR, Plaintiff, v. ARLEN HATTLE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable Karen L. Strombom, United States Magistrate Judge. Dkt. 45. The Court having considered the R&R and the remaining record, and no objections having been filed, does hereby find and order as follows:

(1) The R&R is ADOPTED;

(2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendant Laurence Mays (Dkt. 30) is DENIED; Defendant Laurence Mays' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 35) is GRANTED; and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Laurence Mays are DISMISSED with prejudice.

___________________

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Battle v. Hattle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Dec 24, 2013
CASE NO. C13-5086 BHS-KLS (W.D. Wash. Dec. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Battle v. Hattle

Case Details

Full title:JAMES A. BATTLE JR, Plaintiff, v. ARLEN HATTLE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Dec 24, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. C13-5086 BHS-KLS (W.D. Wash. Dec. 24, 2013)