From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Battim Associates v. L L Estates

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County
Oct 9, 1945
186 Misc. 141 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1945)

Opinion

October 9, 1945.

Charles H. Fier for L L Estates, Inc., defendant.

Abraham Deutscher for plaintiff.


The plaintiff is foreclosing a mortgage not protected by the moratorium. An installment due August 1st was not paid in the manner previously followed, namely by mailing a check the day before. The accountant for the owner was to blame; as soon as he learned of it he mailed it, on August 31st, together with the succeeding installment, due on September 1st. On September 10th, papers in this action to foreclose were filed with the county clerk. There is nothing in the papers to show that the late check, or the one due September 1st, was returned; the retention of these checks ought to be as significant and effective as the retention of any paper in a lawsuit that is served too late but is not returned. While the four-three decision in Graf v. Hope Building Corp. ( 254 N.Y. 1) is still the law, it seems to be the effort of the courts to escape its effect wherever the facts will permit ( Domus Realty Corp. v. 3440 Realty Co., Inc., 179 Misc. 749; Ferlazzo v. Riley, 278 N.Y. 289). The motion to dismiss on the terms proposed is granted.


Summaries of

Battim Associates v. L L Estates

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County
Oct 9, 1945
186 Misc. 141 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1945)
Case details for

Battim Associates v. L L Estates

Case Details

Full title:BATTIM ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, v. L L ESTATES, INC., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County

Date published: Oct 9, 1945

Citations

186 Misc. 141 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1945)
58 N.Y.S.2d 96

Citing Cases

Nichols v. Evans

While plaintiffs note that the checks subsequently tendered were not cashed, plaintiffs retained the power to…

Central Nat Bank v. Paton

The next issue to be addressed is whether the acceptance by the plaintiff of the checks of December 3, 1980…