Opinion
Civil Action 1:18-cv-07681-CM
10-12-2022
DIOCELYN BATISTA, Plaintiff, v. IRON MOUNTAIN INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. and ROBERT E. GOINS, Defendants.
SIMMONS JANNACE DELUCA, LLP ALLISON C. LEIBOWITZ ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS IRON MOUNTAIN INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. AND ROBERT E. GOINS JENNIELENA RUBINO, ESQ. RUBINO LAW FIRM, P.C. ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
SIMMONS JANNACE DELUCA, LLP ALLISON C. LEIBOWITZ ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS IRON MOUNTAIN INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. AND ROBERT E. GOINS
JENNIELENA RUBINO, ESQ. RUBINO LAW FIRM, P.C. ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
NOTICE OF MOTION
MOTION BY: Defendant Iron Mountain Information Management Services, Inc. and Robert E. Goins
SUPPORTING Declaration in Support of Defendants' Motion To PAPERS: Reconsider, dated October 11, 2022, all exhibits annexed thereto; supporting Memorandum of Law; and all prior pleadings and proceedings heretofore had herein.
RETURN DATE, TIME AND PLACE: At the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, at the Courthouse thereof, located at: 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007-2550 before The Honorable Judge McMahon on a date to be determined by the Court.
RELIEF SOUGHT: An Order pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6.3 of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for reconsideration of the Orders dated September 27, 2022, denying Defendants' motion in limine pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 7.1, to preclude plaintiff's expert Scott Haig, M.D. from offering any testimony, reports or opinions in this matter; and denying Defendants' motion in limine pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(a) and Local Rule 7.1, to preclude plaintiff's witness Ingrid Manana from offering any testimony at trial; and upon reconsideration, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum of Law, to grant Defendants' motions in full; and for such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
ANSWERING PAPERS: Pursuant to the Judge's Rules, answering papers, if any, are not required to be served unless specifically directed to do so by the Court.