From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bath v. Vital Recovery Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 15, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02215-RBJ-KMT (D. Colo. Nov. 15, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02215-RBJ-KMT

11-15-2012

BRIAN EDMOND BATH, Plaintiff, v. VITAL RECOVERY SERVICES, INC., and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-100, Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya


MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

Plaintiff's "Memorandum in Support of Motion for Leave to File Amended Pleading" (Doc. No. 11, filed November 2, 2012) is DENIED without prejudice. To the extent Plaintiff wishes to amend his complaint, he must file a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) and attach the proposed amended complaint to the motion. The proposed amended complaint must stand alone, it must contain all of Plaintiff's claims. Here, Plaintiff does not attach a proposed amended complaint to his motion. As a result, it is impossible for the court to determine if the proposed amendments are permissible.


Summaries of

Bath v. Vital Recovery Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 15, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02215-RBJ-KMT (D. Colo. Nov. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Bath v. Vital Recovery Servs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN EDMOND BATH, Plaintiff, v. VITAL RECOVERY SERVICES, INC., and JOHN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 15, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02215-RBJ-KMT (D. Colo. Nov. 15, 2012)