From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bath Med. Supply v. Harco Natl. Ins.

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 5, 2009
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 52278 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)

Opinion

2008-2202 N C.

Decided November 5, 2009.

Appeal from an order of the District Court of Nassau County, Third District (Rhonda E. Fischer, J.), entered September 8, 2008. The order, upon a motion by plaintiff for summary judgment, dismissed the complaint and referred the matter to the Workers' Compensation Board.

ORDERED that the order is reversed without costs, the complaint is reinstated and plaintiff's motion is remitted to the District Court to be held in abeyance pending a prompt application to the Workers' Compensation Board for a determination of the parties' rights under the Workers' Compensation Law. In the event plaintiff fails to file proof with the District Court of such application within 90 days of the date of the order entered hereon, the District Court shall deny plaintiff's motion and grant summary judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint unless plaintiff shows good cause why the complaint should not be dismissed.

PRESENT: NICOLAI, P.J., MOLIA and LaCAVA, JJ.


In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff moved for summary judgment. Defendant opposed the motion on the ground that it had timely denied plaintiff's claim based upon the assignor's eligibility for workers' compensation benefits. The District Court dismissed the complaint and referred the matter to the Workers' Compensation Board. This appeal by plaintiff ensued.

Contrary to plaintiff's contention, the Workers' Compensation Board has the authority to determine whether plaintiff's assignor is entitled to Workers' Compensation benefits ( see A.B. Med. Servs., PLLC v American Tr. Ins. Co. , 24 Misc 3d 75 [App Term, 9th 10th Jud Dists 2009]). However, the District Court should not have dismissed the complaint and referred the matter to the Workers' Compensation Board but, rather, should have held plaintiff's motion in abeyance. Accordingly, the order is reversed, the complaint reinstated and plaintiff's motion remitted to the District Court to be held in abeyance pending a prompt application to the Workers' Compensation Board for a determination of the parties' rights under the Workers' Compensation Law.

Nicolai, P.J., Molia and LaCava, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bath Med. Supply v. Harco Natl. Ins.

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 5, 2009
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 52278 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)
Case details for

Bath Med. Supply v. Harco Natl. Ins.

Case Details

Full title:BATH MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC. a/a/o RODRIGO S. PARRA, Appellant, v. HARCO…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 5, 2009

Citations

2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 52278 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)
906 N.Y.S.2d 770