From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bates v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Oct 13, 1992
863 S.W.2d 616 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 61723.

October 13, 1992.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS; ANNA C. FORDER, JUDGE.

Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for movant-appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.


ORDER


Movant appeals from the denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Bates v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Oct 13, 1992
863 S.W.2d 616 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Bates v. State

Case Details

Full title:TERRANCE BATES, MOVANT/APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Oct 13, 1992

Citations

863 S.W.2d 616 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)