From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bates v. Schroeder

Supreme Court of California
Aug 20, 1888
3 Cal. Unrep. 21 (Cal. 1888)

Opinion

          In bank. Appeal from superior court, San Mateo county; E. F. HEAD, Judge.

         Motion to dismiss appeal, on the ground that no transcript was filed in time. The affidavit of appellant’s attorney, heard upon the motion, alleged that appellant, defendant below, interposed a demurrer to the complaint, which was overruled, and judgment rendered for plaintiff; that within 10 days after rendition of the judgment deponent was taken sick, and confined to his bed and room for about a month, being unable to attend to any business: that, while so confined, he was informed that defendant had requested one of deponent’s clerks to take an appeal in the cause, but that he had directed the clerk not to take the appeal, and supposed his directions had been obeyed; that he was first apprised that appeal had been taken by respondent’s notice of motion to dismiss; that, upon receiving such notice, he caused a transcript on appeal to be made out, served, and filed in this court, and that it was his intention in good faith to prosecute the appeal; that the judgment appealed from is, in his opinion, manifestly erroneous.

         COUNSEL

         [3 Cal.Unrep. 22] D. M. Delmas, for appellant.

          J. C. Bates, for respondent.


          OPINION

          PER CURIAM.

          On an examination of the papers herein the court is of opinion that the appeal should not be dismissed, and the motion must be denied.


Summaries of

Bates v. Schroeder

Supreme Court of California
Aug 20, 1888
3 Cal. Unrep. 21 (Cal. 1888)
Case details for

Bates v. Schroeder

Case Details

Full title:BATES v. SCHROEDER.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Aug 20, 1888

Citations

3 Cal. Unrep. 21 (Cal. 1888)
3 Cal. Unrep. 21

Citing Cases

Gage v. Downey

It is dismissed from further notice as untenable. As this action is brought to recover lands embraced in the…