From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bates Chevrolet Corp. v. Haven Chevrolet

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 26, 1962
16 A.D.2d 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Opinion

June 26, 1962


The corrected final judgment entered on December 28, 1961 is unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and without costs to any party, to the extent of reducing said judgment to the amount of $19,227.38, plus the costs and disbursements taxed in the court below, including in such costs and disbursements the Referee's fee in the sum of $1,750, and is otherwise affirmed. We find upon the proof presented to the Referee that the overhead expenses of plaintiff sales agency were ascertainable and allocable to the sale of the 159 vehicles involved in this action to enforce a restrictive covenant in an employment contract; and that such overhead expenses should properly have been deducted from the assessment of damages in favor of plaintiff ( Cutter v. Gudebrod Bros. Co., 190 N.Y. 252; Tremaine v. Hitchcock Co., 23 Wall. [90 U.S.] 518). Upon the evidence submitted to the Referee the overhead cost allocable to each car was $75, or a total of $11,925 for the 159 vehicles. Settle order on notice.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Valente, Stevens, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.


Summaries of

Bates Chevrolet Corp. v. Haven Chevrolet

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 26, 1962
16 A.D.2d 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Case details for

Bates Chevrolet Corp. v. Haven Chevrolet

Case Details

Full title:BATES CHEVROLET CORP., Respondent, v. HAVEN CHEVROLET, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 26, 1962

Citations

16 A.D.2d 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Citing Cases

Ebsco Industries, Inc. v. Dupree

19 to $855.65 and by reducing the amount of interest therein and the total award of damages and interest…

David Fox Sons, Inc. v. King Poultry Co.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Capozzoli and McGivern, JJ.; Eager and Macken, JJ., dissent in the following…