From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bateman v. Riner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 11, 1934
38 P.2d 581 (Okla. 1934)

Opinion

No. 25563

December 11, 1934.

(Syllabus)

Appeal and Error — Dismissal — Moot Questions — Satisfaction of Judgment Pending Appeal.

Where, pending an appeal, a satisfaction of judgment is filed in the trial court, the proceedings in the Supreme Court will be dismissed as moot.

Appeal from District Court, Nowata County; H. H. Montgomery, Judge.

Action upon a note by J. J. Riner et al. against Z. H. Bateman. From a judgment for the plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Dismissed.

G. Earl Shaffer, for plaintiff in error.

John F. Pendleton, for defendants in error.


This proceeding in error was begun by the filing of the petition in error with case-made attached on May 11, 1934.

It appears by motion filed herein under date of October 12, 1934, that on the 10th day of October, 1934, there was filed in the office of the court clerk of Nowata county, Okla., from which court this appeal is taken, a written satisfaction of the judgment. There is no contest filed against this motion, and it appears to the satisfaction of the court that the same is true. The appeal is therefore dismissed as moot.


Summaries of

Bateman v. Riner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 11, 1934
38 P.2d 581 (Okla. 1934)
Case details for

Bateman v. Riner

Case Details

Full title:BATEMAN v. RINER et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 11, 1934

Citations

38 P.2d 581 (Okla. 1934)
170 Okla. 13

Citing Cases

Wallace v. Boston Mutual Life Ins. Co.

It therefore appears that before the petition in error and case-made were filed in this court the defendants…

Stites v. DUIT Constr. Co.

Mitchell, supra note 6 at 1067.Reece v. Chaney, 28 Okla. 501, 114 P. 608, 609 (1911); Tinker v.…