From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Batdorf v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 1, 2014
2014-3080 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 1, 2014)

Opinion

2014-3080

03-01-2014

RONALD NEAL BATDORF, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DC-0752-11-0461-I-1.

ON MOTION


ORDER

The Department of Defense moves without opposition to reform the official caption to name the Merit Systems Protection Board ("Board") as the proper respondent.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed Ronald Neal Batdorf's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion to reform the caption is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. The Board should calculate the due date for its response brief from the date of filing of this order.

FOR THE COURT

__________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court
s21


Summaries of

Batdorf v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 1, 2014
2014-3080 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 1, 2014)
Case details for

Batdorf v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD NEAL BATDORF, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 1, 2014

Citations

2014-3080 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 1, 2014)