From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Batchelor v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 7, 1997
486 S.E.2d 53 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

A97A0552.

DECIDED APRIL 7, 1997.

Negligence. Spalding State Court. Before Judge Cramer.

Webb, Carlock, Copeland, Semler Stair, William E. Zschunke, Melissa C. Duffey, for appellant.

C. Arthur Moss, Jr., for appellees.


After their property was damaged in a fire started by a child who lived next door, plaintiffs Wally Brown and Dorothy Poole sued the child's mother and David Batchelor, the appellant here, for negligence in supervising the child. David Batchelor was married to the child's mother, but was not the child's father or guardian. And at the time of the fire, David Batchelor and the child's mother were separated, so he was not even present at the house that day. Accordingly, even if we assume all other elements of this cause of action can be shown, David Batchelor cannot be liable because he did not undertake to supervise the child and had no duty to supervise the child. The trial court's denial of David Batchelor's motion for summary judgment is therefore reversed. Cf. McPherson v. City of Fort Oglethorpe, 200 Ga. App. 129, 131 (1) ( 407 S.E.2d 99) (1991) (if plaintiff cannot establish duty, an essential element of negligence, defendant cannot be liable and summary judgment is proper).

Judgment reversed. Johnson and Blackburn, JJ., concur.


DECIDED APRIL 7, 1997.


Summaries of

Batchelor v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 7, 1997
486 S.E.2d 53 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Batchelor v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:BATCHELOR v. BROWN ET AL

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 7, 1997

Citations

486 S.E.2d 53 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997)
226 Ga. App. 113

Citing Cases

Travelers Ins. Co. v. Linn

Because Linn had no duty as a parent to supervise Lee's actions, she cannot be held liable under this theory.…