Batac v. Associated Security Specialists

Full title: ESTELA BATAC, Respondent, v. ASSOCIATED SECURITY SPECIALISTS, Appellant…

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 28, 1992

183 A.D.2d 678 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

584 N.Y.S.2d 56

Opinion

May 28, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anita Florio, J.).

The rule against successive motions for summary judgment warrants denial of the present motion (Graney Dev. Corp. v Taksen, 62 A.D.2d 1148, 1149). Additionally, in view of the questions that surround the nature and extent of the "standing orders" issued by defendant to its security personnel, and absent evidence by defendant that the security procedures in place were sufficient and adequately performed, defendant has failed to establish prima facie that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.