From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Basu-Dugan v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Aug 8, 2008
1:06CV00007 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2008)

Summary

holding that credibility "determinations will be upheld as long as there is some support in the record for the ALJ's position and it is not patently wrong"

Summary of this case from Hutchinson v. Astrue

Opinion

1:06CV00007.

August 8, 2008


ORDER


On February 25, 2008, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff filed objections to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636, and Defendant filed a response.

The Court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objections have been made and finds that they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's rulings, which are affirmed and adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 10) is DENIED, that Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 13) is GRANTED, that the Commissioner's decision be AFFIRMED, and that this action be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED. A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Basu-Dugan v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Aug 8, 2008
1:06CV00007 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2008)

holding that credibility "determinations will be upheld as long as there is some support in the record for the ALJ's position and it is not patently wrong"

Summary of this case from Hutchinson v. Astrue
Case details for

Basu-Dugan v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:SUMANA BASU-DUGAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Aug 8, 2008

Citations

1:06CV00007 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2008)

Citing Cases

Shore v. Astrue

Although Plaintiff disagrees with the ALJ, the Court may not make credibility determinations or substitute…

Sanders v. Colvin

When challenging an ALJ's exercise of that authority, a plaintiff must show that the ALJ either ignored…