From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bassett v. Callison

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 23, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-0539 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-0539 KJN P.

February 23, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Therefore, plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's February 16, 2011 motion for the appointment of counsel (dkt. no. 88) is denied.

DATED: February 22, 2011


Summaries of

Bassett v. Callison

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 23, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-0539 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Bassett v. Callison

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD BASSETT, Plaintiff, v. E. CALLISON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 23, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-0539 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2011)