From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bassano v. Wal-Mart Stores

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jul 17, 2020
Civil Action No.: 18-153 (MAS) (TJB) (D.N.J. Jul. 17, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 18-153 (MAS) (TJB)

07-17-2020

DANIELLE BASSANO, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable Tonianne J. Bongiovanni, U.S.M.J., regarding Plaintiff Danielle Bassano's ("Plaintiff") failure to participate in the litigation. (R&R, ECF No. 17.) Judge Bongiovanni's R&R provides a detailed account of both the Court's and Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, et al.'s ("Defendants") efforts to engage Plaintiff in the litigation, as well as Plaintiff's failure to attend scheduled Independent Medical Examinations ("IMEs"), communicate with counsel, and comply with the Court's orders. (See generally R&R.) According to the R&R, Plaintiff missed five IMEs and failed to respond to her own counsel, resulting in her counsel's request to be relieved as counsel in this matter. (Id. at 2-3.) Judge Bongiovanni subsequently issued an Order requiring Plaintiff "to object, retain new counsel or confirm that she will represent herself." (Id. at 3.) The Order provided that Plaintiff's "failure to respond may result in sanctions including dismissal of the Complaint." (Id.) Plaintiff, nevertheless, failed to respond to the Court's Order or communicate with her own counsel. (Id.)

The R&R also sets forth the legal standard, evaluates the factors set forth in Poulis v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., 747 F.2d 863, 868 (3d Cir. 1984), and ultimately recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's case with prejudice and require Plaintiff to reimburse Defendants $1,450 in "no show fees" associated with her five missed IMEs. (Id. at 3-6.)

The Court received no objections to Judge Bongiovanni's R&R pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.1(c)(2). The Court has reviewed and carefully considered the R&R and other documents on file in this matter and finds good cause to adopt Judge Bongiovanni's findings. Accordingly,

IT IS on this 17th day of July 2020, ORDERED that:

1. The R&R (ECF No. 17), is hereby ADOPTED as the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of this Court.

2. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

3. By September 10, 2020, Plaintiff must pay Defendant the "no show fees" associated with the five missed IMEs, totaling $1,450.

/s/ _________

MICHAEL A. SHIPP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bassano v. Wal-Mart Stores

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jul 17, 2020
Civil Action No.: 18-153 (MAS) (TJB) (D.N.J. Jul. 17, 2020)
Case details for

Bassano v. Wal-Mart Stores

Case Details

Full title:DANIELLE BASSANO, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Jul 17, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No.: 18-153 (MAS) (TJB) (D.N.J. Jul. 17, 2020)