Opinion
WD 80021
01-30-2018
Rickey BASKERVILLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Susan Lynn Hogan, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant. Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.
Susan Lynn Hogan, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.
Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.
Before Division Two: Anthony Rex Gabbert, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton, Judge, Gary D. Witt, Judge
ORDER
Per Curiam:Rickey Baskerville appeals a motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, after the Missouri Supreme Court affirmed his convictions and sentences for three counts of capital murder. He contends the court clearly erred, because deficient appellate counsel prejudiced his appeal by failing to address two errors, after trial counsel preserved the alleged errors for appeal: 1) a prosecutor’s misstatement of law during closing argument, and 2) the unlawful conditions of Baskerville’s pre-trial detention. Rule 84.16(b).