Opinion
Civil Action 1:21-cv-01323-RM-RN
10-26-2021
ORDER
RAYMOND P. MOORE, JUDGE
This matter is before the Court on the recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter (ECF No. 21) to dismiss this case without prejudice for failure to prosecute, failure to appear, and failure to comply with court orders. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Fed R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v); Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.1. The Court accepts and adopts the recommendation, which is incorporated into this order by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).
The recommendation advised Plaintiff that specific written objections were due within fourteen days after being served a copy of the recommendation. The deadline for responding to the recommendation has come and gone without a response from Plaintiff.
“In the absence of a timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate judge's report under any standard it deems appropriate.” Summers v. State of Utah, 927 F.3d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991). Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the magistrate judge liberally construed her pleadings. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972). But after filing this lawsuit in May 2021, Plaintiff failed to appear for telephonic status conferences in July and September. She also failed to respond to the magistrate judge's order to show cause (ECF No. 20) why this case should not be dismissed for her failure to comply with court orders and for her failure to prosecute this case.
The Court concludes the magistrate judge's analysis was sound and discerns no clear error on the face of the record. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the recommendation (ECF No. 21) and the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.