From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Basilio v. Wallace Enters.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 24, 2023
2:22-cv-01514-JCM-EJY (D. Nev. Apr. 24, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01514-JCM-EJY

04-24-2023

JENNIFER BASILIO and BRIANNA BASILIO, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. WALLACE ENTERPRISES LLC, MARVIN WALLACE, 5WS LLC and RONALD MCMILLAN, Defendants.

LEON GREENBERG PC Ruthann Devereaux-Gonzalez Attorneys for Plaintiffs HEJMANOWSKI & McCREA, LLC Malani L. Kotchka Attorneys for Wallace Enterprises, LLC and Marvin Wallace KING SCOW KOCH DURHAM LLC Matthew L. Durham Attorneys for 5Ws LLC and Ronald McMillan


LEON GREENBERG PC

Ruthann Devereaux-Gonzalez

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

HEJMANOWSKI & McCREA, LLC

Malani L. Kotchka

Attorneys for Wallace Enterprises, LLC and Marvin Wallace

KING SCOW KOCH DURHAM LLC

Matthew L. Durham

Attorneys for 5Ws LLC and Ronald McMillan

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (ECF No. 1)

(Fifth Request)

On September 12, 2022, Plaintiffs Jennifer Basilio and Brianna Basilio, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated (“Plaintiffs”), initiated this action by filing their complaint herein. Plaintiffs then properly served Defendants Wallace Enterprises, LLC (“Enterprises”), Marvin Wallace (“Wallace”), 5Ws LLC (“5Ws”) and Ronald McMillan (“McMillan”) with a summons and the complaint.

On November 28, 2022, Plaintiffs, 5Ws, and McMillan filed a stipulation to extend the deadline for 5Ws and McMillan to respond to the complaint until January 12, 2023. (ECF No. 10.) These parties so stipulated because counsel for 5Ws and McMillan needed additional time to gather information to respond to the complaint and because the parties had expressed a desire to engage in preliminary discussions regarding this case before 5Ws and McMillan are required to respond to the complaint.

The following day, Plaintiffs, Enterprises, and Wallace filed a stipulation to extend the deadline for Enterprises and Wallace to respond to the complaint until January 6, 2023. (ECF No. 12). These parties so stipulated because counsel for Enterprises and Wallace needed time to review the file and payroll records and because counsel were going to be out of their offices for the holidays.

This Court granted both of the foregoing stipulations on November 29, 2022. (ECF Nos. 11 and 13).

Thereafter, on January 2, 2023, February 17, 2023, and March 20, 2023 the parties filed additional stipulations to extend the deadline for the defendants to respond to the complaint because the parties desired to continue their efforts to evaluate and discuss a possible resolution of this matter before the defendants would be required to respond to the complaint. (See ECF Nos. 14, 16, and 18). The court granted these stipulations. (See ECF Nos. 15, 17, and 19). As a result, the current deadline for the defendants to respond to the complaint is April 21, 2023.

The parties are continuing their discussions and efforts to find a possible resolution of this matter before the defendants are required to respond to the complaint. Accordingly, the parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that Enterprises, Wallace, 5Ws, and McMillan shall have a 30-day extension, until May 22, 2023, to file their responses to Plaintiffs' complaint. This is the fourth request for such an extension. This extension is not sought for the purposes of delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Basilio v. Wallace Enters.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 24, 2023
2:22-cv-01514-JCM-EJY (D. Nev. Apr. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Basilio v. Wallace Enters.

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER BASILIO and BRIANNA BASILIO, individually and on behalf of others…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 24, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01514-JCM-EJY (D. Nev. Apr. 24, 2023)