From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bashaw v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2869 KJM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2869 KJM-DAD

09-28-2011

KATHLEEN BASHAW, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On July 18, 2011, the court granted defendants' motion to dismiss and allowed plaintiffs twenty-one (21) days to file an amended complaint plaintiff. (ECF 17.) More than two months have passed and plaintiffs have not filed an amended complaint. Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED, within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this order, to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 49 (1991) ("[A] federal district court has the inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to prosecute. . . ."); FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bashaw v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2869 KJM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Bashaw v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp.

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN BASHAW, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2869 KJM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)