From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Basanti v. Metcalf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 1, 2013
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02765-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. May. 1, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02765-PAB-BNB

05-01-2013

DALIP BASANTI, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY METCALF, M.D., JASON ROZESKI, M.D., PLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland


ORDER

This matter arises on the following:

(1) Plaintiff's Motion In Limine to Preclude Disclosure of Subsequent Expert Witness Report Due to Inadvertent Disclosure [Doc. # 126, filed 4/2/2013] (the "Motion In Limine");

(2) Defendant United States' Motion for Leave to Exceed Deposition Time Limit [Doc. # 131, filed 4/9/2013] (the "Motion re Huffman Deposition");

(3) Plaintiff's Amended Motion to Quash, Motion for Protective Order and Motion for Immediate Hearing [Doc. # 135, filed 4/9/2013] (the "Motion to Quash"); and

(4) Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce F.R.C.P. 30(d)(1) and Request for Expedited Briefing [Doc. # 137, filed 4/10/2013] (the "Motion re Scope of Expert Testimony").

I held a hearing on the motions this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here.

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The Motion In Limine [Doc. # 126] is DENIED;

(2) The Motion re Huffman Deposition [Doc. # 131] is GRANTED. The defendants may reopen the deposition of Dr. Laurence Huffman for an additional 3.5 hours of examination. The deposition shall occur in person, and not by video conference, at a date, time, and place as the parties may agree provided the deposition is completed not later than June 10, 2013;

(3) The Motion to Quash is GRANTED. Although I find that the contract in question is relevant to matters in dispute of is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, the United States failed to comply with the requirements of Butler v. Biocare Med. Tech., Inc., 348 F.3d 1163, 1173 (10th Cir. 2003), concerning giving notice of the subpoena. The United States may obtain the contract pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum upon proper notice and service;

(4) The Motion re Scope of Expert Testimony [Doc. # 137] is DENIED; and

(5) At the parties' request and on a showing of good cause, the discovery cut-off is extended to and including July 2, 2013, for the completion of depositions only.

BY THE COURT:

Boyd N. Boland

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Basanti v. Metcalf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 1, 2013
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02765-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. May. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Basanti v. Metcalf

Case Details

Full title:DALIP BASANTI, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY METCALF, M.D., JASON ROZESKI, M.D.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: May 1, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02765-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. May. 1, 2013)