From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barwick v. Behnke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 29, 2013
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00355-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. May. 29, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00355-PAB-KLM

05-29-2013

DARWYNN L. BARWICK, Plaintiff, v. JEFFERY BEHNKE, D.P.O. No. 96003, and MICHEAL MAY, D.P.O. No. 00045, Defendants.


FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.

Pursuant to the Order [Docket No. 84] of Judge Philip A. Brimmer entered on May 28, 2013, it is

ORDERED that the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge [Docket No. 63] is ACCEPTED. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 54] is GRANTED. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Alter Judgement and Conclusions of Law and Direct a New Entry in Favor of Darwynn L. Barwick, etc.[Docket No. 75] is DENIED.

ACCORDINGLY, FINAL JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the defendants and against Plaintiffs recovers nothing and this case is closed in its entirety.

Dated at Denver, Colorado this 29th day of May, 2013.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: ____________________

Edward P. Butler

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Barwick v. Behnke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 29, 2013
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00355-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. May. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Barwick v. Behnke

Case Details

Full title:DARWYNN L. BARWICK, Plaintiff, v. JEFFERY BEHNKE, D.P.O. No. 96003, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: May 29, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00355-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. May. 29, 2013)