From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bartsch v. Seneca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 17, 1964
22 A.D.2d 773 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

November 17, 1964


Motion granted only to the extent of directing respondent to pay for and cause to be filed in the official Family Court file the transcript of the trial and that the said transcript be ordered from the three court reporters within five days after service of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry. If the stenographic minutes are transcribed before December 1, 1964, the parties are directed to perfect these appeals for the January 1965 Term of this court. If transcribed thereafter, the parties are directed to perfect their appeals for the February 1965 Term of this court. The denial of the motion for a counsel fee on appeal is without prejudice to an application to the Family Court under section 438 FCT of the Family Court Act for such relief. In all other respects, the motion is denied.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.


Summaries of

Bartsch v. Seneca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 17, 1964
22 A.D.2d 773 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

Bartsch v. Seneca

Case Details

Full title:DORIS BARTSCH v. CARLO SENECA

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 17, 1964

Citations

22 A.D.2d 773 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Citing Cases

Matter of Jaeger v. Scherer

November 8, 1965 Motion by petitioner-respondent to direct appellant to pay $500 to her for counsel fees upon…

Giacoman v. Boer

In the absence of a statutory grant of such power, it was error, as a matter of law, for the Family Court in…