From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barton v. Rpost International

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Fifth Division
Nov 9, 2009
No. B214665 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2009)

Opinion

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. YC051312, Andrew C. Kauffman, Judge.

Ben-Zvi & Associates and Henry Ben-Zvi, for Defendants and Appellants.

McGarrigle, Kenney & Zampiello and Michael J. Kenney for Plaintiff and Respondent.


TURNER, P. J.

Plaintiff, Kenneth Barton, purports to appeal from a post-judgment order denying attorney fees incurred in a prior appeal. (Barton v. Khan (Dec. 13, 2007, B190428) [nonpub. opn.].) The prior opinion reversed a demurrer dismissal and the case is currently set for trial on January 25, 2010. Tentatively, it did not appear we had jurisdiction because no final appealable judgment had been entered. Because such an order did not appear to be appealable, we issued an order to show cause concerning possible dismissal of the appeal. (Jennings v. Marralle (1994) 8 Cal.4th 121, 126; Olson v. Cory (1983) 35 Cal.3d 390, 398.) The present matter is not appealable. (Code Civ. Proc., § 906; Barnes v. Litton Systems, Inc. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 681, 685; Nimmagadda v. Krishnamurthy (1992) 3 Cal.App.4th 1505, 1509-1510.)

The appeal is dismissed without prejudice. (Code Civ. Proc., § 913.) All parties are to bear their own costs incurred on appeal.

We concur: ARMSTRONG, J., KRIEGLER, J.


Summaries of

Barton v. Rpost International

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Fifth Division
Nov 9, 2009
No. B214665 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2009)
Case details for

Barton v. Rpost International

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH BARTON, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RPOST INTERNATIONAL, RPOST…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Second District, Fifth Division

Date published: Nov 9, 2009

Citations

No. B214665 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2009)