From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barton v. Patrick

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 21, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-107 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jun. 21, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-107 Erie.

June 21, 2007


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on May 15, 2006, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 31], filed on June 1, 2007, recommended that Defendants' motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment [Doc. No. 27] be granted. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail and on Defendants. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the motion and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 21st day of June, 2007;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment [Doc. No. 27] is GRANTED.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 31] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on June 1, 2007, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Barton v. Patrick

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 21, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-107 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jun. 21, 2007)
Case details for

Barton v. Patrick

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL BARTON, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE PATRICK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 21, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-107 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jun. 21, 2007)