From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barton v. Lewis

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 4, 2020
No. 19-6650 (4th Cir. Sep. 4, 2020)

Opinion

No. 19-6650

09-04-2020

BOBBY JOE BARTON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. SCOTT LEWIS, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Bobby Joe Barton, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (9:18-cv-00748-RBH) Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bobby Joe Barton, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bobby Joe Barton seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Barton's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Barton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Barton's motion to place his appeal in abeyance, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Barton v. Lewis

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 4, 2020
No. 19-6650 (4th Cir. Sep. 4, 2020)
Case details for

Barton v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY JOE BARTON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. SCOTT LEWIS, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 4, 2020

Citations

No. 19-6650 (4th Cir. Sep. 4, 2020)