From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barton v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

Supreme Court of Washington.
Feb 8, 2017
388 P.3d 494 (Wash. 2017)

Opinion

No. 93777-0

02-08-2017

Byron Barton, et ano., Petitioners, v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

¶1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its February 7, 2017, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 That the Petition for Review is denied. Petitioner's motion to file a supplement to the Petition for Review and "Supplemental Motion 9.5 Objection" are also denied. Respondent JP Morgan Chase Bank's request for attorney fees is denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Barton v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

Supreme Court of Washington.
Feb 8, 2017
388 P.3d 494 (Wash. 2017)
Case details for

Barton v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

Case Details

Full title:Byron Barton, et ano., Petitioners, v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Feb 8, 2017

Citations

388 P.3d 494 (Wash. 2017)
187 Wash. 2d 1015
187 Wn. 2d 1015