From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barton v. Hill

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Oct 24, 2024
4:23-cv-447-DPM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 24, 2024)

Opinion

4:23-cv-447-DPM

10-24-2024

FREDERICK J. BARTON ADC #142505 PLAINTIFF v. JAMES HILL, Sergeant, P.C.R.D.F.; VIRMESA JACKSON, Deputy, P.C.R.D.F.; MATTHEW COBB, Sergeant, P.C.R.D.F.; CHARLESALLEN, Lieutenant, P.C.R.D.F.; and NIKKHOL HARRIS, Deputy, P.C.R.D.F. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

D.P. MARSHALL JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1. Barton's motion for reconsideration, Doc. 83, is denied for the reasons stated in the Court's earlier Orders, Doc. 65, 67, & 79. He hasn't presented any new facts or law that support allowing his case to go forward.

2. Barton's motion for a trial, Doc. 84, and his motion to compel, Doc. 85, are denied as moot.

3. This case is closed and on appeal. There is no need or reason for any further filings in this Court by Barton at this point.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Barton v. Hill

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Oct 24, 2024
4:23-cv-447-DPM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Barton v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK J. BARTON ADC #142505 PLAINTIFF v. JAMES HILL, Sergeant…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Oct 24, 2024

Citations

4:23-cv-447-DPM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 24, 2024)