From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barton v. Echeart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 19, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02339-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 19, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02339-BNB

10-19-2011

ANDRE BARTON, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY ECHEART, Adams County Jail, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, Andre Barton, is a prisoner in the custody of the Colorado Department of Corrections at the Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility in Canon City, Colorado. Mr. Barton initiated this action by filing pro se a letter to the Court in which he appeared to be complaining about his treatment while incarcerated. On September 13, 2011, Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer ordered Mr. Barton to cure certain deficiencies if he wished to pursue any claims in this action. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Shaffer ordered Mr. Barton to file a Prisoner Complaint on the proper form and either to pay the filing fee or to file a properly supported motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 on the proper form. Mr. Barton was warned that the action would be dismissed without further notice if he failed to cure the deficiencies within thirty days.

On September 21, 2011, Mr. Barton filed a letter (Doc. #3) and two other documents titled "excipt 1" (Doc. #4) and "excipt D File Law Suit" (Doc. #5). Mr. Barton describes being assaulted by Defendant in the letter and in the document titled "excipt 1" and he complains about other issues in all three documents, including the conditions of his confinement, stolen and destroyed property, his placement, his removal from a halfway house, and a lack of adequate medical treatment while in custody. However, Mr. Barton has failed to cure the deficiencies in this action because he has failed to file a Prisoner Complaint and he has failed either to pay the filing fee or to file a properly supported motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the proper form.

With respect to the deficiencies he was ordered to cure, Mr. Barton alleges in the letter to the Court that his case manager stated "he is not getting involed [sic] in district court matter." (Doc. #3 at 1.) However, it is not clear what this statement means because Mr. Barton also alleges that his case manager provided him with a copy of his account statement in January. The Court notes that Mr. Barton has submitted a copy of his inmate trust fund account statement dated January 3, 2011. (See Doc. #5 at 5.) Mr. Barton does not make any specific allegation that he has been denied or prevented from obtaining the necessary forms or a current certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement to cure the deficiencies in this action. Therefore, the action will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to cure the deficiencies. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the complaint and the action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Plaintiff failed to cure the deficiencies as directed.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 19th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO


CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

Civil Action No. 11-CV-02339-BNB

Andre Barton

Prisoner No. 106761

Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility

PO Box 1010

Canon City, CO 81215

I hereby certify that I have mailed a copy of the ORDER and JUDGMENT to the above-named individuals on October 19, 2011.

GREGORY C. LANGHAM, CLERK

By:__________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Barton v. Echeart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 19, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02339-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Barton v. Echeart

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE BARTON, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY ECHEART, Adams County Jail, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 19, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02339-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 19, 2011)