From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barton v. Capital One Bank (Usa), N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 6, 2013
Case No. 12-cv-05412-JST (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 12-cv-05412-JST

03-06-2013

PRISCILLA BARTON, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

WITHDRAWAL AS COUNSEL


Re: Dkt. No. 34.

Plaintiff has moved to permit Attorneys Berman, Brown and Scarlett, and the law firm Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, to withdraw as attorneys of record. Dkt. No. 34. The Court construes this is a request to permit the substitution of the firm Kabeteck Brown Kellner LLP for Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP. See Civil Local Rule 5-1(c)(2)(E). Plaintiff also continues to be represented by Attorney Shulman, and Defendant has assented to the Motion. Therefore, the Motion is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED

________________________

Jon S. Tigar

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Barton v. Capital One Bank (Usa), N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 6, 2013
Case No. 12-cv-05412-JST (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Barton v. Capital One Bank (Usa), N.A.

Case Details

Full title:PRISCILLA BARTON, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 6, 2013

Citations

Case No. 12-cv-05412-JST (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2013)