From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bartlett v. Weimer

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 16, 1957
244 F.2d 955 (6th Cir. 1957)

Opinion

No. 13063.

April 16, 1957.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio; Kloeb, Judge.

Kelsey D. Bartlett, Toledo, Ohio, pro se.

Shumaker, Loop Kendrick, Toledo, Ohio, Wm. Saxbe, Huntington Carlile and Thomas L. Startzman, Columbus, Ohio, Robert O. Stout, Marion, Ohio, for appellees.

Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.


The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel for appellees, and Kelsey D. Bartlett, appellant in propria persona, and the court being duly advised,

Now therefore, It is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the order of the district court sustaining a motion for an order quashing service of process upon appellees and dismissing the action as to them, be affirmed upon the authority of Marten v. Holbrook, C.C.N.D.Cal., 157 F. 716; Whittington v. Johnston, D.C., 102 F. Supp. 352, affirmed, 5 Cir., 201 F.2d 810; and Kenney v. Fox, 6 Cir., 232 F.2d 288, relied upon by Judge Kloeb in his order sustaining appellees' motion.


Summaries of

Bartlett v. Weimer

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 16, 1957
244 F.2d 955 (6th Cir. 1957)
Case details for

Bartlett v. Weimer

Case Details

Full title:Kelsey D. BARTLETT, Appellant, v. Dr. Robert E. WEIMER et al., Appellees

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Apr 16, 1957

Citations

244 F.2d 955 (6th Cir. 1957)

Citing Cases

Hebert v. Morley

And, as might be expected, the District Courts have both set and followed the clear trend of immunity for…

Bartlett v. Duty

The defendants in said prior action filed motions to dismiss which were sustained by this Court. Thereafter,…