Bartlett v. Janecka

Full title: STEVEN BARTLETT, Petitioner, v. JAMES JANECKA, Warden, et al., Respondents

Court: United States District Court, D. New Mexico

Date published: Jun 3, 2008

CIV 06-0564 JH/KBM (D.N.M. Jun. 3, 2008)

Opinion

CIV 06-0564 JH/KBM.

June 3, 2008

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

JUDITH HERRERA, District Judge

The Magistrate Judge filed her detailed Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition on March 4, 2008, and subsequently gave Petitioner a generous extension in which to respond. See Docs. 26-28. Having reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo, I find them without merit. See Doc. 32 at 1-15; Doc. 32-2 at 1-20. I also deny his requests for counsel and an evidentiary hearing. See Doc. 32-2 at 21-22.

Wherefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 26) is adopted;

2. Respondents' motion to dismiss (Doc. 13) is granted;

3. Bartlett's § 2254 petition is dismissed with prejudice; and

4. A final order enter concurrently herewith.