From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bartkowiak v. Medtronic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 2, 2009
64 A.D.3d 1165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. CA 08-01746.

July 2, 2009.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frank A. Sedita, Jr., J.), entered December 17, 2007 in an action for, inter alia, strict products liability. The order, among other things, granted the motions of defendants Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc., Regeneration Technologies, Inc., Mercy Hospital of Buffalo, and Catholic Health System, Inc. to dismiss the complaint against them.

VINAL VINAL, BUFFALO (JEANNE M. VINAL OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

QUIRK AND BAKALOR, P.C., NEW YORK CITY (RICHARD BAKALOR OF COUNSEL), PEPPER HAMILTON LLP, PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS MEDTRONIC, INC., MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INC., MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, USA, INC., AND SPINAL GRAFT TECHNOLOGIES, L.L.C.

WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN DICKER LLP, WHITE PLAINS (JOSEPH A. D'AVANZO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

DAMON MOREY LLP, BUFFALO (AMY ARCHER FLAHERTY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS MERCY HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO AND CATHOLIC HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.

Present: Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Fahey, Carni and Pine, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court.


Summaries of

Bartkowiak v. Medtronic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 2, 2009
64 A.D.3d 1165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Bartkowiak v. Medtronic

Case Details

Full title:CARL BARTKOWIAK, Appellant, v. MEDTRONIC, INC., et al., Respondents, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 2, 2009

Citations

64 A.D.3d 1165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 5435
881 N.Y.S.2d 346