From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BARTILOTTA v. GREAT ATLANTIC PACIFIC TEA CO

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 7, 1966
186 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 1966)

Opinion

No. 34927.

May 4, 1966. Rehearing Denied June 7, 1966.

Writ of certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Richard A. Sicking and Kaplan, Ser Dorsey, Miami, for petitioner.

Fleming, O'Bryan Fleming, Scott R. Anselmo, Fort Lauderdale, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 27, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney's fees is also denied.

THORNAL, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

BARTILOTTA v. GREAT ATLANTIC PACIFIC TEA CO

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 7, 1966
186 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 1966)
Case details for

BARTILOTTA v. GREAT ATLANTIC PACIFIC TEA CO

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY BARTILOTTA, PETITIONER, v. GREAT ATLANTIC PACIFIC TEA CO. AND…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 7, 1966

Citations

186 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 1966)