From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bartholomew v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 2, 2011
Case No. 2:09-cv-0882 JAM CMK P (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-cv-0882 JAM CMK P.

May 2, 2011


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO FILE A DISPOSITIVE MOTION


The Court, having considered Defendants Yang, Lowery, Oseguera, Jones, Newsom, Pavich, Reandelar, Muhammad, Bacud, Garcia, Easterling and Shchebenko's request for an extension of time to file a dispositive motion, and good cause having been found:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendants Yang, Lowery, Oseguera, Jones, Newsom, Pavich, Reandelar, Muhammad, Bacud, Garcia, Easterling and Shchebenko are granted an extension of time of sixty days, to and including June 24, 2011, to prepare and file their dispositive motions.

Date: 4/29/2011


Summaries of

Bartholomew v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 2, 2011
Case No. 2:09-cv-0882 JAM CMK P (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Bartholomew v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN BARTHOLOMEW, Plaintiff, v. D.K. SISTO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 2, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:09-cv-0882 JAM CMK P (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2011)