From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bartha v. Simmons

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Jun 23, 1988
543 A.2d 306 (Conn. App. Ct. 1988)

Opinion

(6109)

Argued June 8, 1988

Decision released June 23, 1988

Action to recover damages for legal malpractice, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Waterbury, where the court, McDonald, J., denied the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment and rendered judgment thereon, from which the plaintiff appealed to this court. Error; further proceedings.

Kathleen A. Hogan, with whom was Arnold H. Rutkin, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Joseph F. Skelley, Jr., with whom, on the brief, was Barbara B. Sacks, for the appellees (defendants).


The plaintiff is appealing the judgment of the trial court rendered upon the grant of the defendants' motion for summary judgment.

Our review of the record with particular regard to the documents submitted to the trial court in support of the defendants' motion for summary judgment clearly indicates that the trial court resolved disputed issues of fact in ruling on the motion. The documents disclose the existence of genuine issues of material fact. Therefore, the defendants were not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fairfield Lease Corporation v. Romano's Auto Service, 4 Conn. App. 495, 499, 495 A.2d 286 (1985).


Summaries of

Bartha v. Simmons

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Jun 23, 1988
543 A.2d 306 (Conn. App. Ct. 1988)
Case details for

Bartha v. Simmons

Case Details

Full title:DEZSO BARTHA v. DONALD SIMMONS ET AL

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jun 23, 1988

Citations

543 A.2d 306 (Conn. App. Ct. 1988)
15 Conn. App. 813