From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barth v. Montejo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 8, 2021
2:19-cv-1874 WBS DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-1874 WBS DB P

06-08-2021

SHAWN DAMON BARTH, Plaintiff, v. EUSEBIO MONTEJO, Defendant.


ORDER

WILLIAM B.SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendant was deliberately indifferent to his medical needs, retaliated against him, and discriminated against him. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 7, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 53.)Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 6, 2021, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 52) is denied.


Summaries of

Barth v. Montejo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 8, 2021
2:19-cv-1874 WBS DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Barth v. Montejo

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN DAMON BARTH, Plaintiff, v. EUSEBIO MONTEJO, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 8, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-1874 WBS DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2021)