From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barth v. Evans

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Sep 8, 1993
860 S.W.2d 354 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 62609.

July 20, 1993. Rehearing Denied September 8, 1993.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY; ALPHONSO VOORHEES, JUDGE.

William P. Grant, William S. Margulis, Margulis Grant, St. Louis, for petitioner, appellant.

Penelope Evans, pro se.


ORDER

Husband appeals from the motion court's order denying his motion to modify that portion of the dissolution decree awarding maintenance. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Barth v. Evans

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Sep 8, 1993
860 S.W.2d 354 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Barth v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:MERLYN BARTH, PETITIONER/APPELLANT, v. PENELOPE EVANS, F/K/A PENELOPE…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Sep 8, 1993

Citations

860 S.W.2d 354 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)